Red Threads is presented by:
Take control of your chaotic inbox
Stop drowning in spam. Proton Mail keeps your inbox clean, private, and focused—without ads or filters.

The Red Thread This Week:
"You can have everything in life you want, if you will just help enough other people get what they want." — Zig Ziglar

Locked in our MoMA mindset
A few years ago we took our kids to the MoMA on a rainy afternoon in New York. My wife and I love art, our kids were curious, and we had one shot.
So we grabbed a map at the welcome kiosk to get started; it was the size of a placemat and useful in roughly the same way.
Then, a docent near the front asked if we had a minute. Two minutes later we had a path, the kids were into it, and we were off.
What made it work wasn't her knowledge, because the map had everything she did.
What made it work was that we trusted her, and she didn't try to show us everything.
So the Red Thread this week is about curation; why it matters when the complete map is free, and why the docent is the real asset.
~ Jaime
🔑 The Unlock
Curation has always created value.
In the 1950s, Alan Freed decided what the country listened to. He's the Cleveland-based DJ who put "rock and roll" into popular use, and when the payola scandal broke and DJs were caught taking money to play certain records, Freed lost his career inside 18 months.
Audiences kept listening to FM radio, but they stopped trusting it the same way.
The cultural authority and curation migrated to magazines, then MTV, then Pitchfork, then playlists, then algorithms running For You pages.
Or take Tina Eisenberg; she’s run Swiss Miss as a design blog for almost 20 years, and she has consistently refused pay-to-play sponsorship.
What’s on offer from Tina is her curated worldview of design and art.
Her audience trusts her, so when she points at something, the recommendation lands with the weight of every generous recommendation she's made before it.
Twenty years of deposits and no withdrawals.
The pattern is the same in every era. The platform changes. The value of trusted judgment doesn't.
1️⃣ Google Just Told You Where the Value Is
Google's AI Overview now sits at the top of nearly every search result. You type the question, the answer appears, and the 10 blue links are still there but below the fold, with click-throughs collapsed or hidden altogether.
This is a public declaration about where the value lives.
For 25 years, Google's job was to point you at the best ten pages on the internet, one page at a time, based on what you dropped in the search box.
The pages did the work, Google did the routing, and the whole business model assumed the destination was where the answer lived (and that ads related to your query and those destinations could be auctioned off.)
That assumption is being retired in real time.
Google has decided the most valuable layer is no longer the destinations. It's the docent at the front, telling you what you need to know without making you wander through the museum.
Whoever owns that layer owns the relationship with the visitor.
If you're publishing content to grow a business, the implication is uncomfortable and clarifying at the same time.
The pages-and-posts model – produce content, hope it ranks, hope they click, hope they convert – is being squeezed from above by exactly the move you should be making yourself.
2️⃣ The Homepage Is Dead
If Google's move tells you where the value is migrating, your homepage tells you how far behind your own approach might already be.
For thirty years the assignment has been the same: build a page that serves 3 or 4 user personas with slightly different needs. The casual browser, the buyer, the skeptic, the comparison shopper.
Every team with a business-critical website has spent enormous time and budget trying to be “perfect” to the “right” person, the moment they arrive.
The result is the buffet-style homepage.
Hero image, 3 value statements, a grid of features, a row of logos, a blog feed, and a footer with twenty-eight links.
Designed by committee, optimized for nobody, and defended by analytics that show nobody is doing the thing the homepage was built to help them do.
The docent move, the curator, kills the buffet.
The next-generation homepage isn't a “better” layout. It's the docent principle applied to your own archive: an AI-powered guide, trained on your actual work, that walks a visitor to the right answer without them having to wander.
Not a chatbot popup that interrupts. An agent that's earned the right to say, "I know what you need, and I can take you there."
What changes when you adopt this posture is that your content archive starts being a much more useful library.
The newsletter you sent eighteen months ago isn't old content. It's a book on the shelf the docent can pull when somebody asks the right question.
The podcast episode from last spring isn't in the feed graveyard. It's part of your archive, available when somebody needs it.
That's the same curator-value Alan Freed lost and Tina Eisenberg kept.
The trust is the asset. The content is the inventory. The interface is whatever lets the right inventory reach the right person at the right moment, without them needing the full map.
3️⃣ Mass Production
For most of the history of media, the constraint was production. Studios were expensive, cameras were expensive, distribution was scarce, and whoever could afford to make the thing and ship the thing had the advantage.
That constraint is gone.
Anyone with a laptop can produce a podcast, a video, a newsletter, or an entire season of content in an afternoon. AI moves the needle from "anyone can produce" to "anyone can produce to infinity."
The instinct in this moment is to compete on volume – produce more, show up everywhere, match the pace of whoever appears to be winning.
That's the broadcaster's reflex, and it leads exactly where you'd expect: a market where everything sounds the same, nobody trusts anything, and the only thing left to compete on is how fast you can race to the bottom and make more of it.
The curator's posture is the hack.
When production is free, the scarce (valuable) resource moves to judgment: what to surface, what to leave out, what to recommend with your name on it. The trust you've built with a specific audience over time is the one asset “more stuff” cannot replicate.
So the trusted curator will always be valuable.
What's changed is that the curator may now be the only thing that is.
💡 Mindset Shift
Once you adopt the curator's posture, you also inherit the responsibility that comes with it.
For example:
If your audience trusts your judgment, what are you choosing to amplify with that trust, and what are you choosing not to?
Whose voices, ideas, or perspectives are you elevating, and whose are you leaving on the cutting room floor?
If the only filter on what you publish is "will this reach as many people as possible," what's that filter actually optimizing for, and what might that cost you over time?
There’s no way around it; the value and power of curation is real.
But it also means that we are responsible for the ideas we choose to spread.
🎲 Prompt Playground
The Curator Audit
Copy + paste this prompt into your AI tool of choice:
Prompt
You are a strategic advisor helping me audit my work through the lens of a curator, not a publisher.
My Context:
What I do: [describe your business]
Who I serve: [your audience]
My main channels: [newsletter, social, podcast, video, website]
My content archive (rough scale): [number of newsletters, episodes, posts, videos]
Help me evaluate:
If I built a "docent" for my website tomorrow — an AI agent that asks visitors what they're trying to figure out and walks them to the right piece in my archive — what three or four questions should it ask first, and what does that tell me about who I'm actually serving?
Looking at my last 10 pieces, which ones would the docent point at often, which ones would gather dust, and what's the pattern?
Where am I still publishing for the algorithm or the impression instead of for long-term trust with my audience?
If production is no longer the bottleneck and judgment is, where am I still acting like production is the game?
Be direct. No hype. Tell me what I need to hear.
Ask me clarifying questions in order to execute this request effectively.
⚡ Before You Go
I co-host Slackers with Jonathan Sasse, a podcast for leaders, builders, and creators who want to make work better.
We just wrapped season 1 and cross my heart, if you want to deliver better work, it’s worth a test drive.
Here are other ways I can help:
🗓️ 1:1 call: Grab 15min on my calendar.
🎙️ Podcast support: Get pro-level guidance without hiring full-time.
🚀 Speaking & workshops: Hit reply, let’s talk.
🤖 AI Prompt Library: 12 prompts to use AI as a strategic thinking partner (free)
And I’d appreciate your help:
🧶 Take a 2-minute survey to help improve the newsletter.
💬 Leave a short testimonial if this newsletter has helped your work.
Both make a real difference.
Thanks for spending time with Red Threads this week, I’m glad you’re here.
~ Jaime


